Reply to Science channel's "Biblical Mysteries Explained"

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "Science channel's "Biblical Mysteries Explained""

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Its just a theory for you because you refuse to confirm it with addl research or asking scholars or imams. You inherently mistrust Muslims anyway so it would not matter even if you did speak with one. Fornication and adultery were common in Arabia pre Islam. Thus it should be obvious that there would be illegitimate children. Most historical accounts are from Arabs. If you don't trust the testimony of Arabs because you hate Islam, then refer to the testimony of the Greeks. [/quote]
Khadija did OK in the jahiliya, didn't she?

Of course, there would be illegitimate children.  There still are, everywhere.  Nothing very much has changed about human nature. No one argued there were no illegitimate children around.  You made a very specific claim  -   that women were rushing toward Mecca with 2-4 children in tow - and provided no evidence for it.

Not all Arabs are Muslim, don't you know.

Yes, I think the testimony of Muslims about how bad non-Muslims had it is ever so slightly biased. [/quote]

Not quite. Its testimony of Arabs on how their own ancestors were. If you want to learn about Arab history, you don't go to the Europeans to learn it. With such mistrust of any Muslim, you can never be open to learning. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics