Reply to If you had an abortion you really didn't want to have

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "If you had an abortion you really didn't want to have"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

First, I apologize to real DCUMers because I'm apparently entertaining a troll. Second, I ask not of this particular troll but of all abortion -related morons out there: Where were you for Relisha? What are you doing for the next Relisha?[/quote]

Who is Relisha and what does she have to do with justifying killing babies? What are you doing for the next Relisha since you know so much about her? Or is "just kill 'em all" your motto.

I would be a troll if I was responding because I thought it was funny. This is not funny and it is nothing to troll about. [/quote]

If you don't know who Relisha is you can get the fuck off this board, since if you don't you are clearly not a DC urban mom.[/quote]

So what you are saying is that you lack the ability to have an intellectual conversation, and that you really cannot connect this girl you brought up to the subject at hand.

Therefore you are just throwing things at the wall, and hoping something sticks so that you don't have to address your bloodthirsty tendencies and lack of regard for innocent humans being slaughtered.
[/quote]

But really. You don't live in or around DC if you don't know who this poor girl is. Her story is heartbreaking. And PP is trying to show that your concern for children seems to begin and end with posting incendiary messages about fetuses on  message board in a city where you don't live.[/quote]

I don't watch the news, so if you have a point to make then make it. Connect your point to the issue at hand. Or admit that you and PP are grasping at straws.

Something bad happened to a child (that I refuse to look up- which is why I don't watch the news) and that means that I don't care about children?

I detect a logical fallacy.
[/quote]

You don't watch the news, presumably because of the sad and scary things that would be covered on the news, but will spend hours arguing about abortion on an anonymous message board? Your priorities are really strange.

I'm not the PP you're arguing with, but here's why it connects.

Many people who espouse a "pro-life" position are happy to spend hours arguing about abortion on an anonymous message board. They care deeply about unborn children. When the children are born, they are generally not supportive of those children except in the following predictable ways: they mention that their church has programs that help families in need (sometimes true, almost never without ideological strings) or they mention that it's not the job of government to take care of children.

The connection to Relisha Rudd is that a system of government not taking care of children in need, which we all are complicit in whether we like it or not, failed to protect a child from her immature and damaged mother, who sold her to a 51-year-old janitory, and no one - not the shelter the family lived in, not the school the girl attended, not the mandated reporters employed by the NGO that spent time with the little girl at the shelter - bothered to seriously look for her until she'd already been missing for 3 weeks.

If you care so deeply about children's lives, why focus on the children that are not yet born? Why not focus on the millions of children in this country who are hungry, who are cold, whose parents abuse or neglect them? Why the focus on the unborn? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics