Reply to Should welfare recipients be required not to have children while on welfare? Agree or disagree? Why

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Should welfare recipients be required not to have children while on welfare? Agree or disagree? Why "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Look, again people are going astray.  YES, we should rein in corporate subsidies to Fortune 500s, or at least place preconditions on them which are beneficial to the nation and which reduce abuse - like, "if you are a Fortune 500 receiving subsidies, you should not be offshoring profits or outsourcing American jobs abroad, you should have restrictions on your PACs and lobbying and you should be fully compliant with all laws for worker safety, environmental regulations, you should be actively working toward sustainable, environmentally friendly practices" and so on.  Taxpayer dollars should ultimately never come without strings attached to induce more socially responsible behavior to benefit the nation.  I would be fully in favor of things like that.

Ultimately it's not about the right of the poor to have kids or be irresponsible - it's whether they have the right to have their irresponsible behavior and also receive taxpayer funds without any accountability or strings attached toward more socially responsible behavior.   [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics