Reply to Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Documents were falsified to get the newborn out of Oklahoma.  That is a fact and constitutes fraud.[/quote]This[/quote]

Not supported by fact.  You love saying this, but never provide any actual "proof."  Go back, read the Supreme Court opinion.  None of that is in there.  [/quote]

Documents were filed with the Cherokee nation with 3 crucial errors in them, in Dusten Brown's name and birthdate.   Documents were also filed listing her as Hispanic. It hasn't been proven that any of these errors were intentional, but the reverse hasn't been proven either.  It seems particularly unlikely to me that the birthmom wouldn't have known the year of his birth since they were the same age and had attended highschool together. Had these errors not been made, it seems pretty clear that the Cherokee Nation would have proceeded to stop the adoption.

It also seems to me that in adoption, the burden of proof should lie with the people adopting the child.  That is that if they can't prove that they did everything to discover whether this child was legally available, then the adoption can't go through.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics