Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Forbes "New Ivy" List"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Is there a reason why UC schools (Berkeley, UCLA, etc.) are not on the list?[/quote] Forbes had an SAT cutoff for the list of schools they gave the c-suite to evaluate, so did not include the UCs because they are test-blind [/quote] How did they adjust for the % of test optional students? [/quote] They don't nor does USNWR[/quote] I do think US News should get an estimate for each TO school, instead of publishing the fake SAT score range reported.[/quote] How would they do that? They'd be making up a number. [/quote] There’re different ways. [b]They can back out the SAT scores of a subset of kids using PSAT scores[/b], then use a model to extrapolate the scores by adding other factors. They can also supplement with pre-TO data.[/quote] This is now going to some crazy extremes that nobody would ever do. Nobody is going to provide specific kids' information to do what you are suggesting.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics