Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Changes in LACs "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][img][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The best LAC’S for successful outcomes are [b]Williams, Amherst;[/b] Williams and Colgate are Wall Street feeders. Davidson is a regional play from Richmond to Atlanta. [/quote] Fixed your broken comment that was completely wrong. Best outcomes are Williams, Amherst, Harvey Mudd, Claremont McKenna (which has an accounting program btw), and Wellesley. [/quote] Again, best outcomes for what?[/quote] Overall. Those students earn the most. It’s a mix of best outcomes for finance and economics and STEM. If you’re interested in grad school, I wouldn’t keep any of these other than Harvey mudd for the list.[/quote] Ahh. So the only way to measure outcomes is how much money you make. Got it. Screw all those public servants and teachers and folks running non-profits. [/quote] If you’re interested in being a public servant or running a non profit, Williams, CMC, Amherst, and Wellesley are also amazing options, though. It’s not screwing over anyone- these schools are pretty good across the aboard. Kind of the point of…a liberal arts college.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics