Reply to FCPS Boundary Review

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "FCPS Boundary Review - New Maps"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]That’s not an FFM post but also doesn’t support your claim. I agree with that poster btw that there should be more transparency in the KAA process.[/quote]

It may not be a FFM post, but it is from a member of Fairfacts Matter who [b]represents the organization on the BRAC committee.[/b][/quote]

Everyone is allowed to have varying opinions in things, even within the same organization.  Requiring a purity test and giving group condemnation for individual thought is not a normal way for adults to interact.[/quote]

Of course they do.  However, someone had said that  FFM had not said anything about extra buildings that could be used in a response about the KAA purchase.  Perhaps it is not on FFM Facebook, but it is posted by their representative to the BRAC committee.
 [/quote]

So what?  Why shouldn’t people ask FCPS whether it explored alternatives before committing to drop $150 million (and the final price tag will be higher) on a building designed as a private K-12 school for about 1000 kids?

Again, that’s not opposition to the deal, just an effort to understand whether any rigor went into FCPS’s decision.  The SB had been claiming FCPS was cash-strapped for years and couldn’t possibly do anything for other overcrowded schools, so it’s a surprise when they suddenly announce they are prepared to cough up $150M that wasn’t fully funded to buy KAA.  We still don’t know where the money will come from or what other renovation projects will be delayed. [/quote]

I live in the area.  They have promised a high school for years.  It has been in the CIP for years in some form. The last excuse was that they could not find a site.  KAA is a great site for the area that needs relief.  The price was right.  
The only objections seem to come from FFM and their reps.  The post by the representative of FFM attacks the purchase on many levels.  Since the area clearly needs relief according to FCPS and they were proposing all sorts of "creative" boundary moves in the area, this makes great sense.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics