Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Missing Middle travesty in Arlington "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Can a lawyer explain how/why this can happen? Having a court rule one way, then a few days later rule the complete opposite way, makes no sense. I'm not sure I've ever heard it happening before. I didn't even know it could happen.[/quote] It happens occasionally. In a trial court, it's typically called a motion for reconsideration, and in an appeals court like this, it's typically called a petition for rehearing. The standard is usually pretty tough -- i.e., you can't just say that the court screwed up and repeat the same arguments you made before, but instead you must essentially show some glaring error. The decision is pretty bare bones (https://www.arlingtonva.us/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/departments/documents/cmo/eho-trial-transcripts/court-order-petition-for-rehearing-granted-8-july-2025.pdf), so without seeing the parties' legal briefs, it's tough to know what the error was here that caused the appeals court to reverse itself.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics