Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Kilmar coming back"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It is the only way the administration can bring him back with a wisp of dignity. They've been preparing this for weeks and Pam Bondi rehearsed her speech so she could say it with a straight face. The DOJ lawyer in charge of his case before his deportation was fired, because he told the truth to the judge. [b]Hopefully justice prevails. [/b] [/quote] They've trumped up a clearly unproveable human trafficking charge in order to buy time to legally deport him. Added bonus, no one is talking about CECOT anymore.[/quote] There is video. The trooper could also testify. Maybe it is not provable, but it looks pretty much like evidence to me. But, I'm not lawyer. [/quote] The DOJ claims he was trafficking people, but there is a filing on record from before the incident with the full disclosure that he was traveling to MD from Texas. Why would someone who was trafficking people notifiy the authorities of the same?[/quote] The administration is grasping hard. What an embarrassing week for Trump.[/quote] The Tennessee grand jury indictments are very serious. It was not done on a lark. What it really means is that while people like you were screaming due process, the people behind the scenes quietly did some investigating and found out a lot more about the El Salvadoran Kilmar. Which is unfortunate for him, I suppose. Ironically he probably would have been better off quietly accepting the deportation order instead of fighting it. And I wouldn't be surprised if more stuff comes out later, potentially about his activities in El Salvador. He was unquestionably a human trafficker. [/quote] He is a day laborer driving day laborers. That is not human trafficking. I hope some day you reflect on your party's treatment of human beings. The cruelty is shocking. No one who has any critical thinking skills believes this fabrication. Murdoch, Trump, DHS and all the followers believe that simply repeating fabrications makes them real. It does not. Some of us care about the truth.[/quote] 30 percent of the people he brought in were MS-13 according to the indictment. And yes, we believe it. You are the same people who insisted he was “Maryland man” and not a gang member with a history of beating his wife. Guess the left wants to die on this hill.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics