Reply to Trump admin ADMITS wrongful deportation

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Trump admin ADMITS wrongful deportation"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is worse than Signalgate-it is not just incompetence on display here but depraved indifference to a human life.  This is an incredible human and civil rights violation and should be the top story until this man is freed and brought back home!  Listen to what Jamie said-this guy was basically snatched off the streets and flown out of the country to a maximum security prison know for civil rights violations!!!!!! And this Dump administration says too bad so sad??????? AYFKM?  And maga wonders why people look askance at them?  This is monstrous and if you support this you are a monster.  Plain and simple.  Due process of the law is something that sets us apart from dictatorships and authoritarian regimes.  (that means it's good dips$%#!!!!!)[/quote]

There’s one thing that would have prevented all of this. Don’t sneak over the border illegally in the first place. That was a decision HE made, and if HE would have made a better decision, none of this happens. [/quote] You missed the part about due process.  Not surprising.[/quote]

You missed the part where’s there is no need for due process if you do not commit a crime [/quote]

Oh, you precious dumb dumb …

Due process is the essential framework utilized to determine whether you actually committed a crime.

Without the protections afforded through due process, you would be incarcerated for having molested all those young children over the years. Who needs due process, an untested accusation is proof enough, right?

See how that works, (moron)?[/quote]

He admits sneaking across the border illegally. That is a crime. If he never did that, no need to deport. Why are you defending someone that could have simply stayed in his own country? If he would have, he would not be in this situation. [/quote]

I’m not defending him.

I’m defending the rule of law. And it’s shocking that you don’t understand that it’s not about defending him at all.

You just don’t get it.[/quote]

What rule of law are you referring to?

It's all pretty clear to me in this paragraph.  You don't get a hearing.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/21[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics