Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Vance’s Latest Misogynistic View"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I agree with his core premise—- it’s much better , in most cases, for a child to be raised by parents/grandparents vs daycare. Universal daycare is what is eww in this discussion. [/quote] I do too. Totally. I would also like to point out that this audio is clearly edited... who knows what is spliced or missing. And, it is an article from Salon, so that makes it even more questionable. Having said that, if advocating for having a grandparent assist with the care of a newborn infant is misogynistic, call me a misogynist. I like when he pointed out that she could have just continued working and given some of her salary to help them out, but she chose to help with the care itself. And, I say this as someone who is currently in this exact position.... and I'm not Indian. A grandmother who is lucky enough to help with the care of her grandchild during the critical first years of development. I wouldn't trade it for anything in the world. [/quote] Talk about editing!!?? They did not say either grandparent. They referred to the one who has a uterus that can no longer carry a fetus to term, after which the person with the uterus is of limited use. [/quote] Being on a podcast with another dude talking about a woman's ability to menstruate is just deeply, deeply weird - even if it's the other guy who actually said "menstrual." Trying to explain it away as being more about the concept of grandparents generally being involved in childcare is really disingenuous. [/quote] And don't forget that this is the guy who said that people without kids don't have a stake in the future of the country. This guy 100% has a breeding fetish. [/quote] Of course he has a breeding fetish. He realizes that with Covid and general age, the GOP is losing more voters than gaining. The GOP is shrinking faster than they are replaced. He knows that with time, the party is going to shrink to the point that even the electoral college will not be enough to salvage the party's ability to get elected to national office. Trump doesn't care because Trump is going to die long before the point of no return. But Vance is young and he can see the party dying out of influence before the end of his political career. So, GOP breeding more and having more babies and children raised in conservative households is one long-term way of working to counter the issue.[/quote] lol. He has no beliefs. He doesn’t care about the GOP now let alone in 20-40 years. He is a political prostitute who sings for his supper. [/quote] +1 Truth! Wait till he loses. He will be singing a different tune. [/quote] Yup. He was Peter Thiel's puppet before he was Trump's [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics