Reply to According to American Academy of Pediatrics Benefits of Circumcision Outweigh Risks

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "According to American Academy of Pediatrics Benefits of Circumcision Outweigh Risks"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]This is nothing more than a "good ole boys" decision; men perpetuating something that was done to them.  Currently, about 80-90% of all adult males are circumcised in the US.  Since the rates have been plummeting for the past decade, in another 10-20 years, the majority of adults - including doctors and hospital administrators - will themselves be intact.  Once the majority of pediatricians, OBs, and AAP policy makers are intact, there is no way they will continue to encourage this procedure to be performed. [/b]

What is especially interesting here is that there is no new study or research that influenced this updated policy.  As others have mentioned, this is simply about getting Medicaid and private insurance companies to continue paying for it.  Any willing parent can dig into the research and see that the scientific case for circumcision is extremely flimsy.  Yes, cutting off an otherwise healthy body part can ensure that the body part will never have an infection later in life.  But why the foreskin when there are so many other body parts that cause incurable disease?  For example, men develop breast cancer at triple the rate they develop penile cancer.  Why not remove all male newborn breast buds?  Think of the medical benefits!  Of course the difference is, so many adult males in this country have had their foreskin removed, that they simply do not understand that the foreskin could have any value, and they have a psychological need to justify their own circumcision by encouraging the continuation of the practice.  Again, that is going to change as the younger generation of intact boys grows up.

In terms of circumcision, no other pediatric association in the developed world comes to the same conclusion that the AAP does; in fact many are now leaning towards prohibiting or outlawing the procedure in non-consenting newborns.  The only reason this has continued to be acceptable here, is because the doctors themselves are cut.  Oh, and because it is a multi-million dollar business for hospitals.  Very difficult to undo that.  I challenge any parent who is asking a pediatrician or OB for advice about this, to also ask the (yes, personal) question of whether the doctor is himself cut.  I guarantee that those who are encouraging you to do it are cut themselves, and therefore can't actually understand from a personal perspective the benefits of having a foreskin.[/quote]

This is a very, very weird way to frame this decision. I believe that male privilege and white privilege exist, but to assume that they made this decision based solely on a a "good old (circumcised) penises" club is to completely deny the science without being able to refute it. I've read both things: the science is not supportive and there are more studies coming out that will be even more supportive of circ.

Really what kind of conversations do you imagine took place? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics