Reply to virtual academy 2022-2023

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "virtual academy 2022-2023"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's weird (and a little creepy) how many parents who don't have children at MVA care so much about the program and want it shut down. I don't find the budget argument convincing. While MVA may not save MCPS money, it also doesn't appear to impose much of a burden that would impact other schools.

I know a family whose children are thriving at MVA. They didn't perform as well in the in-person environment. I am only happy for them.

To be frank, [b]it seems like you can't accept that some children can thrive in an environment different from your own kids'[/b]. Perhaps there are some insecurities or unresolved issues at play.

It's just so strange. Don't you have better things to do? Why bother posting at all?

[/quote]

Oh, I accept that children thrive in different environments.  I have four kids.  Two are/were in MCPS and the other two are in private. The ones in private don't thrive at our home school, but they do thrive at their wonderful small school with smaller classes. Anyone who has kids who don't "thrive" at MCPS should reach into their own wallet and pay for the alternative environment.

[/quote]

Your privilege is showing.  You really need to accept the fact public schools don’t serve just who you think deserve an education. Public school isn’t a one-size fits all. With this mentality, [b]should we also cut the community-based programs that serve highly disabled children?[/b] You know, children who don’t (can’t) meet your standard of acceptable data? Some of [b]those children [/b]are thriving at the Virtual Academy. You are so tone deaf you can’t even see your blatant discrimination of innocent children. You really are despicable.  [/quote]

Wait. Are you arguing that "highly disabled children" are being served by MVA? Because that's a clear FAPE violation given that the level of services required are not built into the MVA model.

If you are arguing against special education in general, based on outcomes, here's a big difference between MVA and a self-contained classroom for a kid with intellectual disabilities - the kid with disabilities has an IEP to allow them to access the curriculum at whatever level is appropriate.

Someone asked up thread why some of us care about MVA. First of all, because the folks arguing FOR MVA in this forum are the absolute worst possible ambassadors for the program. I can't count how many times MVA advocates have accused the rest of us of "not wanting to be around our children." Moreover, the arguments for MVA in this forum are bad, like escaping predominantly poor/working class peers.

Finally, because we have systems in place. If a child needs a specialized placement, the parents can and should go about getting one, even if it's just a COSA to a school with new social dynamics. But what MCPS should not do is provide a bespoke education with 5 kids to a class just for kids who have a parent at home. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics