Reply to SAHMs and marriage dynamics?

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "SAHMs and marriage dynamics?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Ultimately, every marriage would be destroyed in this kind of situation. Men just don’t find it attractive.[/quote]

That doesn’t make any sense.  The primary role of a wife was to raise kids and maintain the household since the beginning of time.  Yes some women worked outside of the home or somehow earned a living, but the identity of a wife was raising kids and taking care of the home.

That’s why I don’t really buy the posts saying men are turned off by a SAHM and want a professional woman who looks good in meetings.  This goes against biological desire.  A woman having a high earning job in an office is something relatively new.  To say that now a man wants that sexually is too much of a change in a short period of time.  [/quote]

Huh? Where did you learn your history?

In many [b]societies the vast majority of women are working in the fields or factories  [/b]and their children are being raised by extended family. Elite women always had wet nurses and others to raise their kids. I think this idea of women as full time mothers is very modern and coincides with certain socioeconomic changes. It is definitely not happening for elite women or women who have to work in the nineteenth century…[/quote]

I bet their husbands were turned on by their ambition and drive working in the field.  They would have been so bored with a wealthy woman staying at home.  [/quote]

Wealthy men had multiple wives or partners [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics