Reply to Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Did anyone listen to yesterday’s episode? Natasha addressed how she’s able to stay at home.[/quote]

Yes, I heard it. She all but called out DCUM by name, lol.[/quote]
I thought that was funny too.

I am surprised that she didn’t request that he have life ins for the child support too. Unless that is what she meant by the girls being covered by life insurance. She just called out the alimony directly so seems odd she didn’t say that for the child support. [/quote]
Haven’t listened but I’m assuming she stays home thanks to life insurance?

I wonder how long they’re going to try to drag this out for and what they’ll talk about once they’ve hashed / rehashed / rehashed again every second of the kane era [/quote]
He had an insurance policy from when she was owed alimony. He never canceled it after she remarried so that is part of the money. The money supporting the girls (food, clothes, housing) comes from a life insurance policy he left them.

There focus after the first three shows isn’t really about just Kane. They’ve parlayed it into shows focused on addiction support, divorce support, narcissistic abuse, etc. Yesterday’s show was sort of an AMA and how Natasha can afford to not work was one of the most asked questions.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics