Reply to Youngkin supports overturning Roe v Wade

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Youngkin supports overturning Roe v Wade "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Guess y’all shoulda reigned in your far leftists before the gubernatorial election. Live and learn. [/quote]

Oh yes this is the leftists’ fault. Make it make sense.[/quote]

Why is Youngkin in office? [/quote]

Because he successfully scared suburban white women. Its as simple as that.[/quote]

If you’re a suburban t white women in VA who voted for Youngkin, don’t come to DC for your or your daughter’s abortion.  STick to your principles.[/quote]

That’s right. Only worthy women are entitled to control their reproduction: rape victims, incest victims, and Dem voters. Nice principles you got there. [/quote]

DP.  Are you kidding me?  You vote against abortion rights for others because you know that if you or someone you care about ever needs one, you have the resources to send them to DC?  What kind of craven jackass are you?[/quote]

DP. No one voted against abortion.  It was not on the ballot.  [/quote]

Yes, it was.  Youngkin was caught on camera saying he wanted to go after abortion after he was elected, and everyone knew it.  You don’t get to pretend abortion wasn’t an election issue just because the word wasn’t literally printed on the ballot.[/quote]

Last fall, RvW was settled law.  No matter what Youngkin wanted or said.

RvW was settled law.  Now it's not.[/quote]

Don't be unreasonably  obtuse. Trump ran in 2016 saying that he was going to nominate right wing SC judges who would overturn RvW, he even made a list of names pubic before the election. he nominated three as we all know and it was clear (lies during confirmation notwithstanding) that they were going for it and with a super majority of 6-3 even Roberts could not do much to moderate. If RvW was overturned, decisions would go back to the states. Youngkin said he was going to go against abortion if elected.  so only people with an IQ of 10, or people who have never read a newspaper or seen a news broadcast in their lives can say that they are so surprised now they could have never imagined that abortion would have been an issue in Virginia if Youngkin was elected. [/quote]

For some reason, believing what Republican politicians say makes you obtuse [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics