Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "One D.C. stop-sign camera brought in $1.3 million in tickets in 2 years"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Nextdoor had a whole thing on the Fessenden traffic light. People who have made complete stops and counted to three (or higher) have still received tickets. Contest it. There were multiple complaints about that one on Nextdoor. [/quote] People on that Nextdoor thread alleged that but of course you also need to completely stop behind the stop bar which is the other thing most drivers don't do (besides not stopping). Here is the thing - if you got a stop sign citation there is an on-line video! That you can share and prove you were improperly cited. The outraged guy who started the Nextdoor thread actually had the decency to share his video and guess what - he coasted right through the stop sign! He didn't even get close to the spirit of a legal stop to say nothing of the actual letter of the law. There is a guy on that thread who has now posted 2 30-40 second videos he shot at 44th and Fessenden and in neither video does even a single driver make a legal stop and only a couple of drivers even come close. The guy over in Crestwood who is outraged he got 3 citations at 17th and Blagden and has been bloviating on the Crestwood listserve for months also shared all 3 of his video citations and guess what - he also didn't come close to a legal stop! He doesn't even claim in interviews that he actually made legal stops just that it is outrageous and unfair that the law is being strictly enforced. Here are the 3 videos: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wTBMmn9jyBpnIIH2q5mi75UMuT11ast_/view https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NVt7GKwsF0A0T4-NlXsJBJ3LoLQHWGGA/view .[/quote] NP here who doesn’t even live in that area, so please don’t attack me. What’s wrong with these stops? From this angle, it seems like the driver came to a complete stop, albeit a brief one. [/quote] No they didn't. They slowed to a crawl and then sped back up. A car coming to a complete stop, even a brief one, will rock backward when its forward momentum disappears.[/quote] Looked like a stop to me. What additional safety is gained by waiting four seconds?[/quote] I love crossing as a pedestrian when people "come to a stop" but are really just rolling at me as I cross. Be happy with a ticket. If it was up to me...[/quote] Was there a pedestrian there at the time? Haven't seen the video. If there was, then the operator shoud definitely get a failure to yield ticket, which presumably costs more, and points. That's the type of infraction we need enforcement of. If there wasn't then I don't understand. It is safer to have a little momentum when turning into an intersection with oncoming traffic. Especially considering the rampant speeding.[/quote] [b]Here a deal: no more tickets for rolling a stop sign when no one is around, but cameras on EVERY stop sign and crosswalk that give tickets every time when a pedestrian is around. Sound good?[/b] I've got Elon Musk working on the algorithm, which will be ready by the time I'm mayor. Vote for me.[/quote] No, this doesn't sound good. Pedestrians are safer if drivers stop every time. You're trying to create a world where you only get a ticket if you actually endanger a person, but by relying on drivers to decide whether a person is likely to be around ad hoc. Drivers, particularly those who think "let's make a deal I break the law when I want and no harm no foul" is a good deal, are not good at risk assessment. Stop at stop signs. Even if you don't think there's a person nearby. Because that's the law. Stop signs are the simplest part of driving. My three year old knows what they mean. The fact that so many people on this thread are flummoxed and then outraged by them makes me think that an IQ test should be part of the application to get a drivers license.[/quote] If a pedestrian is not around then it doesn't impact their safety whatsoever. [b]The rule is simple, if a pedestrian is there then all non-pedestrians are supposed to yield. That is the law.[/b] The purpose of stop signs is to identify who has the right of way and who needs to yield. [b]Gor instance, I just saw a cyclist not only blow a stop sign but also turn left into the path of a car already stopped at a stop sign. [/b] This clear cut failure to yield was a major safety hazard and a blatant violation of both the spirit and letter of the law. And no, your 3 year old does not know what a complete stop is. 99.9% of people do not come to a complete stop every single time, including yourself. I am far more concerned about people following the spirit of the law than the letter. There are a host of safety reasons, including visibility around bushes, why people do not always stop behind the line or come to a complete standstill 100% of the time.[/quote] Actually, the law is to stop behind the white line before proceeding. That is the law. You want to rewrite it so that you can pick and choose which stop signs deserve real stops and when you can continue on your merry way. Except your imaginary new law the cyclist you're so mad at did nothing wrong, because a car is not a pedestrian. Oh wait, what's that? The only purpose of a stop sign is not to allow pedestrians the right of way? No kidding! You are a bad driver. I'm glad you get tickets. I hope you get booted too.[/quote] I am not a bad driver and I do not get tickets. I know this is difficult to understand and reading comprehension is hard for you but try reading all the words in a sentence and not assuming everyone is subconsciously trying to self-justify their own bad acts. Speaking of which, do you regularly blow stop signs on your bicycle? That was a very odd reply[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics