Reply to Bridgerton, Season 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Bridgerton, Season 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I LOVED Season 2! I liked the unusual angle, I liked both the main characters. I thought their chemistry was much better than Daphne and what’s his name. Those two were so awkward to watch. Season 2 was light, fun, sexy and addicting. [/quote]

Ewwww. There was no chemistry. Season 2 was dreadful. Daphne and Simon were loads sexier and more fun. [b]Kate and Anthony were just an awful combo. Even looked bad together[/b]. [/quote]

+1 I said this before the season even started. Kate doesn’t match with Anthony at all. Horrible casting.[/quote]

What are you people talking about? How should they “match?” They’re two hot young people. They look great together. I don’t find the romance compelling but it’s not because of how they look. [/quote]

I agree, and think they matched just fine.[/quote]

Eh, they don't look good together. She is broader in the shoulders then he is. He is too tiny for her. [/quote]

Yes! She looks like a horse![/quote]

+1 Horse face.[/quote]

How? Sarah Jessica Parker has horseface not this lady. [/quote]

Her nose I doesn’t match her face. She needs a nose job.[/quote]

Omg are these real thoughts that real people have? Earnestly  enough to write them down and post them on the internet?[/quote]

I agree the comments are a half step away from being racist. None of the guys are really hot other than from the first season but where are the comments about them?[/quote]

Totally. That comment about how they should have chosen [b]Pryanka Chopra instead because she’s more “classically attractive”[/b]… how do you not interpret that comment as “they should have case an actress who looked closer to White?” I suppose it could just be a coincidence that they picked an Indian actress who could pass for white, but goodness. [/quote]

I am the PP who said this. What I deleted was that she is an Indian actress who is more suited because she has a larger head. Look at most any successful actor and they have bigger heads, which translates better onto the screen. I think this Kate is beautiful, but not as well suited to the screen as some others. I never thought about Chopra as seeming more white. I just didn't want to use another actress that was of any other race than Indian. I should have just been oddly insulting but more specific, than to appear racist.  [/quote]

PP here, and that is bizarre, so bizarre in fact that I looked it up and it's true, bigger heads fill up the screen so they are preferable, lol. [b]I still don't see how somebody can criticize the appearance of Simone Ashley, next to her I imagine we'd all look like 5s, but I do see what you mean about a smaller head. [/b][/quote]

The other PP here. And yes, it's a bizarre fact about film. And part of the problem that I think people are experiencing is Kate's appearance is jolting expectations. I just watched a scene between Lady Danbury and Kate. Both have their hair back in a pony tail or long braid. No headdress of hair style. And Lady Danbury's head is significantly bigger than Kate's, which is jolting. Same as when she is in scenes with Anthony. His head is giant compared to hers which makes them seem not to match.

But look at Tom Cruise, Leo DiCaprio, the list is long. They also are generally short. Big head with short stature (some more than others) make them seem more substantial on screen and fill it more. It's just what most viewers are used to seeing.

And agreed, in real life we all are 5s or less to Kate! [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics