Reply to Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]And yes, I know he wouldn't ultimately be convicted.  But it would keep the conflicts of interest and January 6th continually in the public eye.  January 6th was the lowest point in American democracy since the Civil War and Trump wanted to turn the US into an autocratic dictatorship and a substantial number of members of Congress wanted to help him do it.  
And the loonies have spent the last 18 months trying to purge the Republican party of those remaining members who DID do the right thing.  [/quote]

So here's the thing.  You're basically suggesting using constitutional processes and the power of the government to further a political party's agenda.  That is exactly what was happening in the prior administration.  Let's just stop doing that.  All of us, regardless of party.  [/quote]

So the Ds should just look the other way? Disregard corruption because it might benefit them?

Ridiculous given how the Rs have actually abused their powers for their own benefit and to support illegal behavior. 
[/quote]

I'm not suggesting that nothing be done.  I'm supportive of the 1/6 commission, and any prosecutions that result.  I'm also supportive of everybody talking about it publicly, etc.  What I am not in favor of doing is impeaching a justice "for show" and to create spectacle.[/quote]

I agree.  No Supreme Court justice has ever been successfully impeached.  Another lost impeachment hearing will cost Democrats in the long run.  [b] Shame him into retirement[/b] or charge his wife criminally or both.  Keep her conspiracy to overthrow our government in the news.[/quote]

[b]Maybe Mrs. Thomas runs into some issues, though I don’t know how you sanction her for using her right to speak freely. But the notion that Justice Thomas must resign underscores the Democrat plot against America. You can’t hand Biden an illegitimate chance to fill another SCOTUS seat. People forget that Justice Thomas did nothing wrong.[/b]

If somehow Justice Thomas is forced out or driven to death, his seat needs to be held open until his party takes the Presidency. It’s only fair.[/quote]

There are no republican or democrat seats on the Supreme Court.  You need a civics lesson.

Plotting to overthrow a free and fair election is not free speech. [b] It remains to be proven that Clarence did something wrong but I'm of the opinion that he probably did.  Guilty people act guilty and he certainly is. [/b] My mind keeps going back to Ginni's partner and co founder of Turning Point that day after the insurrection.  He proudly tweeted that they paid for 80 bus loads.  It was deleted but someone somewhere must have a screen shot.  If true she funded the insurection.   Clarence retiring does not give Biden an "illegitimate" pick for the Supreme Court.  If there's an opening during President Biden's term it must be filled. [/quote]

It remains to be proven that your husband is a child molester, but he probably is. 
See how that works?[/quote]

He just walked out of a hotel room with a kid. Still don’t know what happened in that room but it doesn’t look good. 
[/quote]

The husband in question did not use his Supreme Court position to vote against an investigation of child exploitation.  He’s not married to a child molester either. Think really hard since you chose this comparison.  Why are you so focused on that?  Fighting your true nature? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics