Reply to SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://mobile.twitter.com/imillhiser/status/1466055785574805520[/twitter][/quote]

"We just continue to let" - what exactly is he proposing?

I hate how this happened -[b] but this is what people voted for. [/b]Trump did what he said he was going to do: appoint Sup Ct justices to overturn Roe.

[/quote]

People did. Of course, not the majority of the people that voted, but yes, ELECTORAL COLLEGE. I get it.

The theory at work here is that Trump's actions after the 2020 election in trying to get Biden's win overthrown, should negate the authority of his appointments and those three justices should be removed. I am not really on board with that, but it's pretty rich that three justices are sitting there under the appointment of a one-term President that didn't win the popular vote and refused to accept the results of the election he lost. I mean, this isn't really representation. This is ivory tower ideologues making decisions that affect us all.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics