Reply to stop whining about voter ID requirements

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "stop whining about voter ID requirements"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If it was just about voter fraud they wouldn't have banned giving water to people waiting in line. [/quote]

Agree. Also, they wouldn't have the provision allowing statewide officials (read: GOP) take over country (read: dems) functions in order to award elections, which could be state, county or federal, including for electoral college votes.[/quote]

Are you speaking about what Nancy is doing to Iowa-2?[/quote]

What "Nancy is doing" is actually within the scope of the law, though I personally feel that the election has been certified and she shouldn't bother. It does raise the question as to why the votes were not counted. Same thing happened in NY-22, and that cost the Dems a seat as well. This is why we need the Lewis Act to become law. Thanks for making my point.[/quote]

Votes were counted, then recounted.  Then, certified by a bipartisan team of electors. 
And, instead of going to the courts, like she is supposed to do, the loser went crying to Nancy.  Probably because she knew she had a sympathetic audience with her and the courts would have thrown it out.  
The last thing we need is this House bill to become law.  It is not "for the people" at all.  [/quote]

22 votes were not counted.  The race was won by 6 votes.  I have no idea whether those votes should have been counted but since they are difference making they should find out whT[/quote]

The bipartisan group of electors seemed to think everything was proper. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics