Reply to Ellen Page announced new identity as Elliott Page

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Ellen Page announced new identity as Elliott Page"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Some of the wide-eyed responses here are just wild. If you can read at an 8th grade level or name all the Kardashians, you sure as hell have the mental capacity to comprehend gender identity.

To pretend otherwise is just willful ignorance.[/quote]

The people on this thread asking questions are not people who give a fig about the Kardashians.

The truth is most of this gender stuff makes little sense. You are born with a biological sex.  It is based on your chromosomes.  What does it mean to be a man or a woman beyond that?  What does it mean to say you know you are a different gender than what your chromosomes indicate?  Separate from biological sex most ways we define gender are a bunch of made up bullshit that varies from culture to culture. People who pretend this is cut and dried are full of it.  [/quote]

The way I see it is that everything else in nature is a spectrum and we are now realizing that gender and sexuality are also on a spectrum.  [/quote]

Gender expression is on a spectrum.  Sex is binary in human beings.  [/quote]

That's generally true, but not always. There are many variations. There are people born with three chromosomes -XXY. There was a TED Talk by a woman who presents as a woman and was born with a vagina, but she has XY chromosomes. If people exist outside of the binary, then by definition, there is not a binary.[/quote]

Those are disorders of sexual development - genetic mutations.   Some people are born missing limbs.  That doesn’t change the fact that human beings have two arms and two legs.   That is not a spectrum.  [/quote]

Exactly. As for “assigned at birth,” this makes it sound like doctors arbitrarily pick someone’s gender. No, they don’t assign a “gender” at all. They observe the newborn’s biological sex and record it.  The push for this new language denies science & facts. We can be respectful of all types of people without doing that.

Regarding the “deadname” article— that stance is ridiculous. Continuing to call someone by a name they don’t prefer is rude. But mentioning what someone used to be called for informational purposes should be a non-issue. People change their names for all sorts of reasons— marriage, divorce, adoption, Prince, etc. I’ve never heard any of these other groups get upset about the mere mention of their former name. [/quote]

+100
In addition, are we supposed to simply forget all the memories we have of our pre-transition life?  Our entire childhood simply doesn’t exist because someone who is now “dead” experienced it?  Ridiculous.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics