Reply to new Reade/Biden thread

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "new Reade/Biden thread"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Someone on twitter brought up a valid point. She claims to have also been a senate staffer at the time and recalled that the dress code required women to wear pantyhose with skirts. Those of us who are old enough to remember pantyhose can verify that they were constricting enough to practically cut off circulation. It is hard to imagine that he was able to reach up her skirt and inside pantyhose far enough to penetrate. Especially while standing up in a hallway where someone could have walked by at anytime. [/quote]

I'm from that generation and I remember thigh highs. Don't you? They were all the rage,
 Any plenty of women have worn stockings with a garter versus actual pantyhose. Some do for health reasons. [/quote]

[b]Not in the early 90s[/b][/quote]

Yes, in the early 90s.  My mother bought them for me.  Who they hell are you to speak for all women and products? [/quote]

I am someone who was in my early 20s in the early 90s. [/quote]

And so was I!  Yet, I was given and WORE thigh highs!  [/quote]

To work? LOL. Ok, maybe you did. But, literally, I don't know anyone else who did that. I wore a lot of tights and hose, though. As did most if not all the women I knew.[/quote]

DP.  Thigh highs ARE hose, dope.  Maybe you didn’t wear them, but plenty of women did.  Move on.[/quote]

DP. I wouldn't say "plenty of women" wore them. I'm from that era and I don't know anyone who did.

But, you know what, it's irrelevant!  Because she said her legs were "bare" and that isn't possible with hose, tights or thigh highs.

Move on.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics