Reply to Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]What do you believe the FBI agents are guilty of?[/quote]

Entrapment.  They put it in writing.  
[/quote]

Uh, where?  Do you mean the interview prep notes?  That's not entrapment.  So I assume you're referring to something else? [/quote]

If they did what they put in the prep notes, it is entrapment.  
Also, the prosecutor is in trouble if there was a "side deal."  If there was and it was not in the plea agreement, the judge must dismiss the case.[/quote]

Entrapment strategy:  Ask him a question.  He'll lie.

That's a pretty sorry NSA.  But you're correct that's why Trump was never questioned under oath.  Because he cannot speak without lying.  No wonder he likes Flynn so much.

[b]PS - there was no side deal.[/b]  [/quote]

“We have a lawyers’ unofficial understanding that [prosecutors] are unlikely to charge Junior in light of the Cooperation Agreement,” -- from 1st released email.

It was not in the plea deal.  Thus, a side deal.

[/quote]

[b]If the prosecutors say there's no side deal, there's no side deal.  How could there be?[/b]

If it's not in the agreement, it's not in the agreement.  [/quote]

Because there was no "official" deal...i.e. one that Flynn knew about.  If there was, they would have had to disclose it.

That is WHY there WAS an "official understanding" between counsel.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics