Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "Pipeline to ECNL"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]why is coppermine suing Pipeline?[/quote] Have not read the pleadings, but basically, a Coppermine coach either gave or sold email addresses for Coppermine families to Pipeline. Pipeline then sent emails to 2008 families (maybe others, I don’t know) expressing interest in their attending Pipeline tryouts. Some of these kids then attended tryouts and switched to Pipeline. [/quote] I don’t believe any of the Coppermine players actually switched to Pipeline. Two left from that Coppermine 08 team left and went to SAC though.[/quote] If no one actually left, the damages argument is even weaker. [/quote] No, the actionable activity is in getting the list illicitly, not players leaving. [/quote] In a civil suit, you have to prove damages of some type, in addition to “actionable activity.” This is just a power play by Coppermine which likes to throw its weight around, deep pockets from having so many facilities and so many different types of club teams. [/quote] The damages are the value of the list(s?), and damages can be more than value if there was fraud involved. Again without seeing the complaint we don’t know what the theory of damages.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics