Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Residents appeal MCPS boundary changes, challenge legality of diversity focus"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] If they did this in places where FARMS students are diverse racially, it is fine. But in Montgomery County 87% of FARMS students are Hispanic (55%) or African American (32%). FARMS rate is a good proxy for race in Montgomery County. MCPS did balance out FARMS rates but MCPS also balanced out racial compositions in Rocky Hill MS and Neelsville MS. It is up to the State Board or a court to decide whether this is constitutional.[/quote] The logical consequence of your argument is that school districts would only be allowed to look at school poverty rates if everybody were equally likely to be poor. In school districts where some groups are more likely to be poor than others, school districts would not be allowed to look at school poverty rates. That would be really dumb.[/quote] The Supreme Court said that racial balancing is unconstitutional. Is [b]racial balancing [/b]at the same time as economic balancing constitutional? You think it is. The State Board or a court will look at the totality of the circumstances to decide.[/quote] Rocky Hill MS Currently: 25% black, 30% Asian-American, 17% Hispanic, 21% white, 7% more than one With the boundary decision: 32% black, 21% Asian-American, 19% Hispanic, 14% white, 5% more than one Neelsville MS Currently: 30% black, 9% Asian-American, 53% Hispanic, 5% white, 3% more than one With the boundary decision: 21% black, 17% Asian-American, 46% Hispanic, 11% white, 5% more than one Those are the numbers you consider to be prima facie evidence that the boundary decision was unconstitutional racial discrimination.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics