Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Greater Greater Washington as a news source"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous] [quote]Uh huh. Like the family with two kids and a dog and want a yard north of Germantown will find an upscale flat above a Sweetgreen in DC to be a substitute. [/quote] A few might. But even if not, all market segments in the regioin are connected to some degree - the flats above sweetgreen might draw some singles living together sharing a rowhouse, which might draw a couple with one kid and no dog from a SFH in Bethesda, which yes, might draw someone from Germantown. Or to think of it another way, if we do NOT build flats for people, they are going to go somewhere. At some point that leads to something being built somewhere else. If we restrict development in all the already developed areas (and the arguments against for NW DC are repeated in almost the same terms in Arlington, in Bethesda, etc) then they will go to sprawlville. Directly or indirectly. [quote]Don’t forget - Greater Greater Washington and its allies have actually argued against the Montgomery County Agriculture Preserve but now they piously invoke preservation of the countryside to argue for upzoning and lots of infill development in Ward 3. The only connection to the countryside that many of these so-called “urbanists” have is the horse shit that they are trying to sell us.[/quote] I am quite sure GGW has not. Some market urbanists who are more focused on the market part than the urban part maybe, but not GGW. And their ally, the Coalition for Smarter Growth, was originally formed with help from the Piedmont Environmental Council, as part of a case for rural preservation. Thats why they have that name - when they opposed sprawl, they wanted to make clear they did not oppose ALL growth. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics