Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "WSJ article on more students especially the affluent get extra time on SAT"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Oh please. My kid was diagnosed in 2nd grade. And it wasn't because of poor grades. His grades were quite good and he was advanced in math. We didn't pursue testing because we were thinking about the SAT down the line or because we were trying to give him an advantage. We got them because the "elementary" school suggested we do so. My son's issues are mainly attention, slow processing, and executive functioning. It is a brain "disorder" which qualifies as a disability. It puts him at a disadvantage against his peers -- technically. It just turns out he is lightyears brighter than most of them. This is what I think is maddening to many people. But it is what it is, and because of it, my son has been highly successful in school, testing, and college admissions. Sorry that bothers you all. [/quote] Your kid doesn't actually have a disability he is obviously quite bright. So why accept accommodations?[/quote] Not PP, but that is a false dichotomy. It is a whole lot more complicated than that.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics