Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Joe Biden: Second woman accuses ex-VP of unwanted touching"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Joe Biden is an honorable man and there has ever even been a whif or hint that he is some kind of molester or pedophile let alone an adulterer. being handsy and invading peoples personal space in public (or private) is NOT cool but lets be real here - he is not a pervert. So unless someone comes out with a new claim to that effect all this discussion is just distracting from the real issues and the dems goal of winning this next election. so stop it unless you would like to have an actual pervert in office for another four years [/quote] The point is NOT that anyone is accusing him of being a deviant, pervert, etc., but that if he was a *conservative* politician, they would [b]absolutely have already labeled him as such[/b]. His career would be over, if he was conservative. That's what the liberal machine does. And now, that machine has turned on its own. So spare us your hypocrisy. We all know that if wasn't liberal Joe Biden, this inappropriate behavior would have long ago been mischaracterized as something horrible, rather than just something inappropriate, annoying, and off-putting.[/quote] Huh? No it doesn't. What are you talking about? If this were true, Trump would be collecting welfare checks.[/quote] You seem to keep missing the point, so nvm. :roll: [/quote] So you can't give an example to prove your own point.[/quote] Kavanaugh ring any bells?? [/quote] His career is far from over. Next?[/quote] But it was no biggie for you and your fellow Democrats to try your level best to ruin his life and career, based solely on a 35+ yr. old accusation with zero substantiation or corroboration. Sorry you weren't able to end his career, but make no mistake - the nation saw your true colors and won't forget.[/quote] HAHAHA, PP! You are a numbskull and I really hope you are not a woman. Biden has not been accused of ATTEMPTED RAPE. That Kavanaugh got through only speaks to the corrupt Republicans who lied and ignored the facts. Had Dr. Ford complained about "feeling uncomfortable" about a hug, I would have dismissed her immediately. And then you have your dear leader who has what? 16 or 17 sexual assault claims against him? Make no mistake, PP. The nation sees YOUR true colors and will not forget. #BeBest[/quote] Speaking of numbskulls... you and your fellow Democrats clearly have no concept of innocent until PROVEN guilty. One woman accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault, after more than 35 years. She had no details to offer, no where or when - things that one doesn't forget if they've been assaulted and (apparently) haunted by it for decades. Not one of her friends could corroborate her story. And yet, you believed her with zero reservations. Why? Because you would've done anything to see his confirmation fail. Why? Because he's a conservative. It's that simple. As for Trump, have any of those sexual assault claims been proven? Has he been found guilty? No. They're just claims. So [b]you [/b]#BeBest, PP. Sounds like you're going to need some help in that arena. [/quote] Then why wasn’t it investigated? Oh right. Because “boys will be boys”. No need to dig deeper. [/quote] It *was* investigated. He was investigated by the FBI six times. And no one had any evidence to share with them regarding the allegations. What a waste of time and money, investigating a 35+ yr. old claim. :roll: [/quote] Background checks? Uh no. No need to be so intellectually dishonest. [/quote] Speaking of intellectually dishonest - you're claiming he did not have six FBI background checks? If so, you're lying.[/quote] No, I was saying background checks <> criminal investigation. [/quote] How's Justin Fairfax's criminal investigation coming? Shouldn't be hard to look into, considering there are two accusers and plenty of facts to check out.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics