Reply to Reported: Susan Rice unmasked names caught up in surveillance

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Reported: Susan Rice unmasked names caught up in surveillance"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Leave it to the Trump camp to use a black woman as the boogeyman.[/quote]

That is a racist comment on your part.  It is also a deflection.

Rice did not have to "leak" the information--because she "unmasked" the name(s), the change in Obama's rules allowed the information to be disseminated widely --in other words, she was able to get the information to lots of people without "leaking"......

As for  making her the boogeyman, she has done that to herself.  She has proven herself a liar at least three times that I can count:

1. The Benghazi "video"--she lied on five Sunday talk shows.
2. Berghdahl served with "honor and distinction"--if that is not a lie, then she is stupid.
3. On PBS last month when she knew nothing about the surveillance.[/quote]
We asked several experts whether, given military law and tradition, they thought it was proper for a senior government official to say that Bergdahl had "served the United States with honor and distinction."

[i]The experts said it’s a tricky question to apply to someone whose background is as murky as Bergdahl’s is, but they added that Rice’s accolade shouldn’t be dismissed out of hand, at least on technical grounds.

"The word ‘honor,’ when used in the context of ‘honorable service’ or an ‘honorable discharge’ generally means honest and faithful service according to the standards of conduct, courage, and duty required by law and customs of the service of a member of the grade to whom the standard is applied," said Richard D. Rosen, a retired Army colonel who now directs the Center for Military Law and Policy at Texas Tech University. The word "distinction," meanwhile, "indicates that the soldier did something above what is expected of a soldier of the same grade and rank," Rosen said.

The lack of an official judgment against Bergdahl, combined with his five years in captivity, could be justification for saying he served with "honor and distinction." From what we know of his official records, "Bergdahl served honorably, competently, and with recognized potential for service at the higher ranks," Rosen said.[/i]
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics