Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Can we analyze jennifer lopez?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I've liked other movies she's been in recently - the mother on Netflix was good.[/quote] I liked Shotgun Wedding for the campy action movie it was.[/quote] Monster in Law is great as well . It was also Fonda’s comeback movie and Jennifer’s commercial comeback after the flop of Gigli . She starred opposite Garner’s ex boyfriend and costar Michael Vartan in that movie as his fiancée . I wonder if she chose that on purpose because [b]Garner was Affleck’s rebound[/b]. These two have some sort of ax to grind about Ben. I am sure Garner was the one leaking stories about Ben leaning on her shoulder for help. It’s not appropriate for her to spend days and nights with Ben without the kids . He’s a married man. [/quote] Lopez didn't dump Affleck, he dumped her for Garner.[/quote] I think there’s bad blood there . On Ellen Degeneres show, J Lo refused to say Garner when asked to mention other famous Jennifers in a five second recall game lol. She feigned ignorance when reminded by Ellen of Jennifer Garner [/quote] There is 100%. Ben and JLO were engaged when Garner was all heart eyes about him. I think one of them even said they fell in lovd during daredevil while he was still very much with jlo. Now I d agree with the pp, he didn't leave JLO for Garner but Garner definitely played a part. Ben did anything and everything to get out that engagement. JLO obviously feels a certain way about her still and that's fair[/quote] At one point earlier this year, both J Lo and Garner bat signaled about wanting MORE kids . They’re both in their 50’s. They’re both older than Ben. J Lo was first with news stories about surrogacy.. I wonder if that’s what pushed this current divorce and why Ben is running. Ben has always put his foot down that he doesn’t want any more kids. Frankly, I don’t think he even wanted the ones he has. His family line is plagued with substance abuse and depression and I don’t think he even wanted to marry Garner but girlfriend was able to make sure she got off birth control to trap him fast and hence they had their shotgun wedding . All credit to J Lo because even she didn’t go that far in her chase of Ben[/quote] Garner did not say she wanted more kids. I don’t know why people are pushing this rumor from one comment taken out of context. She and Christy Turlington have a mutual friend who works for a nonprofit raising money for maternal health. Jen and Christy went on her podcast - the whole topic was their mothers, becoming a mom, their journey in motherhood. For the purpose of raising awareness For the nonprofit that works for global maternal health. Jen was asked about her pregnancies and she talked about how each time she got pregnant very easily. The host said, “so you were born to breed huh?” Jen laughed and made a joke about how she could probably go out on a field and pop one out at 52. She was obviously kidding. A few years ago, some fans commented during an appearance for her organic kids food company that she looked pregnant in her overalls. At the time she said, “I’m not pregnant. I’m 48. I’ve had three kids…. This pupper is done, and I will never be pregnant again.” She has not said anywhere that she wants more kids. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics