Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Indictment Monday?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]As the defense moves for a mistrial, recall, Stormy already told all of this on national television. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/stormy-daniels-describes-her-alleged-affair-with-donald-trump-60-minutes-interview/ The idea that this is new information is simply a lie by the defense.[/quote] Trump denies he had an affair/sex/whatever with Stormy. This s not even important to the case but this shows Trump is lying destroying his credibility with the jurors. Does not matter SCOTUS will have the last say and declare him innocent. They will some how claim jurisdiction over the case and over turn it. It’s not like anyone could do anything. They do not even have to have a relevant reason to take the case. They can just take it. No one can over rule them. [/quote] SCOTUS doesn't have review of a NY State proceeding.[/quote] State prosecuting a federal statute. Surely that is something the Supreme Court can review. There are many more 1/2 baked arguments(like the president has immunity, etc) that could kick this to the Supreme Court. All it takes is the willingness of the court to jump in. They have certainly demonstrated that will. [/quote] The state is prosecuting NY State law. If this were a federal proceeding, then it would by SDNY, but this is the AG office. [/quote] What is the extra crime being prosecuted? There is nothing mentioned in the indictment. Without the extra crime, the case is a misdemeanor. They are trying to prosecute federal law, as explained previously in this thread. This case should be tossed because the indictment does not specify a felony crime.[/quote] NY has its own laws, it is outlined in the charging documents. You can google it.[/quote] I read the indictment which was linked in this thread. It mentions one law about business fraud. It does not mention the extra crime except to quote the first law. Nowhere does it state the NY (or federal)law that was violated that made the business fraud a felony.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics