Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "GA Case"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is nothing about being a woman or an AA. This is about someone having HORRIBLE judgment against one of the most influential persons in the world. She just ruined justice for everyone because she was 'lonely'. Don't take the case if you can't sacrifice. She is a huge disappointment.[/quote] You are buying into the smear campaign. Congratulations.[/quote] No, in every company in America, you get a lesson about sexual harassment... not dating subordinates. Also she could not get it someplace else[/quote] He was a contractor, not an employee. [/quote] You can argue semantics, but she hired him and had authority over his employ, right? [/quote] I think the distinction matters for things like work policies. You may see no difference, and that’s fine. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
