Reply to Tourist submersible missing on visit to Titanic

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Tourist submersible missing on visit to Titanic"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I can’t stop thinking about this but what does implosion mean? I’m trying to visualize this and the pressure? What does it do to the sub and human body? Is it like a plane explosion mid air?[/quote]

It is the opposite of explosion. In an explosion, an source on the inside of a structure (usually an ignition) drives everything catastrophically out. In an implosion, a pressure source on the outside of a structure (here, water pressure) drives everything catastrophically in.

The end result of both, to the human body, is pulverization.

This is why having a vessel that could withstand water pressure of this intensity was such a high priority, and why having failed to assure that was such a glaring mistake. Almost suicidally in error.[/quote]

Homicidally in error. [/quote]

If the CEO had lived I would definitely have expected charges in this vein, and it would not shock me if there is civil litigation against other Oceangate execs along those lines.

What jurisdiction can they be made in? any lawyers here know?[/quote]
No jurisdiction[/quote]
That particular area of the Atlantic belongs to no one, and because the submersible was transported via another boat and launched from that location, it doesn’t technically belong to any jurisdiction. [/quote]

But the implosions was not the violation. The civil infraction took place with the manufacture , marketing and ticjet sakes, no?

Thise happened elsewhere. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics