Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Indictment Monday?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The conservative news bubble is really doing a great job confusing their views. The NY case is strictly a business fraud case, nothing more, 34 counts of it. It doesn’t matter if he had an affair, the election has no impact here, doesn’t even matter if he actually slept with the porn star. The only thing that matters is that he committed fraud and the prosecutor is trying to prove intent (that it wasn’t just a mistake). You can’t payoff a pornstar and list it as a legal expense. Neither would a hooker or your cocaine (regardless of how energized it makes you to work) be a business expense.[/quote] Now what? [img]https://i.imgur.com/jwB2i63.png[/img][/quote] Now we see what Spanky got in return for the $130k he paid her. [/quote] Whatever you have to tell yourself to keep your sanity. This is going to turn out badly for you. Trust me.[/quote] If you’re implying that if Trump wins that means it turns out badly for me and the rest of the country, I totally agree. [/quote] Well, it'll turn out badly for you, but you and others are well deserving, after using our justice system for election interference and nothing more.[/quote] DP. Michael Cohen has already gone to prison for this. How do you fit that into your "election interference"?[/quote] It's all election interference by the State of NY. Pretty simple.[/quote] The election interference was in 2016 when Trump covered this up illegally. The concept of the cover up was not illegal. The way it was executed was. It is an open and shut case based on the evidence provided by the prosecution thus far.[/quote] LOL. No, it's not. At all. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics