Reply to DCPS students shafted again - sign petition to keep Jelleff field public

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "DCPS students shafted again - sign petition to keep Jelleff field public"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is the most liked comment from the most recent Washington Post story on Maret jelleff.
[quote]
This whole thing stinks like yesterday’s fish.

If Maret wants a place for its kids to play, they should find a plot of vacant land to buy at market rates. The city property belongs to all District residents and should be available first to public school students, not a privileged few.

The fact that Jack Evans is involved in this sweetheart deal is further guarantee that there’s something sleazy and corrupt going on. 
[/quote][/quote]

So what are you doing to defeat Crooked Jack and Muriel Barry Bowser?[/quote]

Start your own thread in the metro politics forum if you want to discuss that.  This thread is about Maret’s backroom deal to use jelleff rather than paying a market rate for a playing field like other private schools do.  [/quote]

No this thread is about DPR decision making and a petition based on innuendo and lies. Not to mention every conspiracy theory imaginable and then stick in tin foil for your hats. [/quote]

Glad if you point out some lies.  So far we have people who want something from Jelleff (Evan's son's admission to the school) arranging a no bid deal and then doing it again.[/quote]

Conspiracy theory tin hat nut job.[/quote]

Please point out the lies. [/quote]

The entire petition wording. Your entire post. You prove anything you’ve said. It’s innuendo and conspiracy theory fever dreams. You prove anything you’ve said. That’s right. You can’t. So you and your 3 other friends post conspiracy theory nonsense over and over because you have no factual basis to stand on. And everyone. Sees. Through. It. [/quote]

I've already posted several times links to both the original Memorandum of Understanding and the easement. The plain language of both support the contention that this renewal is highly irregular. Tell me what facts or sources you can provide to rebut that contention. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics