Reply to Boundary Review Meetings

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Boundary Review Meetings"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Tune in by zoom for these meetings.  Scenario 4 was driven by input and BRAC.  Who screams the loudest gets what they want.

10/16 Reid:
1. SPA's will be available in response to a question from someone dev scenarios.  Community participant -Static SPA's do not account for students in new residential - ie Tysons area new builds.  
2.  Expects no macro changes - could be other changes for scenario 5 based on community comments and BRAC.
3. no response I heard on the 1 comment I heard on Kingsley Commons- isolated feed now to Timberlane and might be only SPA assigned to Jackson/Falls Church.  It's a sad mess for that community which didn't appear to participate.
4. Relooking at TOV now assigned to Marshall in scenario 4

Lots of Lemon Rd commenters- less than 25% and some years 10% are in boundary for Longfellow/Mclean.  Some want split redrawn so more goes to Mclean- ie Route 7 is the line.
[/quote]

Kingsley Commons might be the only SPA at Timber Lane assigned to Jackson/Falls Church, but it will account for most of "new" Timber Lane.  It would be 61% of Timber Lane and 329 kids, and it would be a Timber Lane attendance island where the kids would have to cross Route 29.  These kids probably would have been better off just staying at Graham Road even if GR was outside its attendance area, but they are out of luck now.  [/quote]

If they do this change Kingsley Commons should get to either stay with Timber Lane and go to Longfellow/McLean or the area North of 29 that goes to Timber Lane/Longfellow/McLean should all be moved to Jackson/Falls Church. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics