Reply to Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I wonder when the liberals here will realize Twitter is illustrating the dangers of partisanship. When Twitter was a liberal-run cesspool, you all had nothing to say except “go elsewhere if you don’t like it!” Well, now, the shoe’s on the other foot. Go elsewhere rings hollow, doesn’t it? Maybe just maybe the lesson is that politically-motivated moderation of social media is a problem? [/quote]

How was it a "cesspool?"

It was a "cesspool" because Twitter was occasionally and reluctantly taking action against your toxic disinformation?  It was a "cesspool" because reality was being allowed to flourish, instead of your far right wing bizarro propaganda and talking points?[/quote]
Example: all the Libs of TikTok did was quote leftist/liberals. That’s it. Banned.[/quote]

False.  That's not "all they did, that's it."

Her account spewed a lot of hate, made a lot of gross misrepresentations, encouraged targeting, harassment and violence toward numerous hospitals, and toward the LGBT community.

Libs of Tik Tok *is* the cesspool.[/quote]
Bull. Provide examples. [/quote]

DP.  Are you actually trying to deny this happened?  https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/09/02/lgbtq-threats-hospitals-libs-of-tiktok/[/quote]
I followed the entire saga tweet by tweet and examined wayback machine archives too (which was necessary after the hospital deleted the statements it had made on its own website). Libs of TikTok literally did not lie about a single thing. She quoted the hospital word for word and kept doing so.

See, you can argue that she has malicious intent in amplifying the damaging admissions made by the people and institutions she quotes. But you are outright lying to say she misrepresents anything. The fact that she doesn’t lie and just quotes insane, embarrassing, and disturbing material from people on the far left is what makes her so devastating and impossible to take down. Libel lawsuits will fail, she hasn’t ever broken the law, and she doesn’t even violate Twitter’s rules because quoting someone’s own words is allowed. [/quote]

So you’re saying you think it is a fact that all LGBTQ+ teachers are groomers and pedophiles?  Yeah, there’s no helping you out of your delusions. [/quote]

The PP didn’t say that at all. Stick with the message the PP gave you, as its correct. [/quote]

That was one of the examples cited in the WaPo article.  PP claims that Libs of TikTok did not lie about anything. [/quote]

WaPo has a credibility problem We are asking you to back it up with actual Libs of TikTok tweets.[/quote]
exactly. Notice that they’re not posting a single tweet. They’re posting a politically motivated article characterizing what Libs of TikTok said. Her Twitter page is still up and they could easily quote what she wrote if it was false. The posts on this forum are part of a pathetic embarrassment of a smear campaign against someone who has been humiliating leftist extremists by amplifying what they themselves have confessed.

If public attention on what you are doing makes you scramble to cover your tracks, well then I’d say it’s pretty clear you know what you’re doing is wrong.[/quote]

I don't know about anywhere else, but I do know that what she claimed about DC's Children's Hospital was false.[/quote]
What did she claim? Please link or post the actual tweets, not your version of events.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics