Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Bad Art Friend"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]So almost a month after this all went down, I'm curious about the one thread in the story that seemed the most egregious to me in terms of the NYT article covering up misconduct-- using Dawn's plagiarism suit and her earlier sexual harassment suit as evidence that she was an unreasonably litigious person. While the article and group texts pretty clearly showed the IP violation to be legit, I haven't heard anything about the sexual harassment claim, even though at least one writer on twitter has talked about CM/Grubstreet members attempting to sexually coerce her. It sounds conspiratorial but it really seems to me like Kolker tried to frame Dawn Dorland as a narcissistic stalker to make her allegations of sexual misconduct by Grubstreet staff sound bogus. It doesn't sound like Dawn or anyone else involved wanted to get into the details of this, but it's a much more serious problem, legally, than the trash talking/group stalking. I wonder if anything's going to come of that, or if Dorland and Lauren Hough and whoever else are (understandably) too burned out to keep pursuing action?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics