Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "FFRDCs"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]FY 2025 FFRDC Attrition Rates (Page 34, Figure 15) -- Rand and Mitre are the only two FFRDCs with double-digit attrition. http://www.cto.mil/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Defense-Research-Enterprise-Review.pdf[/quote] They were targeted.[/quote] By who? For what?[/quote] They are gatekeepers. They evaluate systems (products and vendors) with an unbiased viewpoint and cannot personally profit off their recommendations. Inconvenient truths that can cause others to lose business. The report is correct in identifying the nsec ceiling as an arbitrary barrier. In today's world FFRDC funding is in the noise.[/quote] Why wasn't attrition high for CNA, IDA, Aerospace, LL, and SEI?[/quote] The CNA FFRDC is very small and very narrowly focused on a single customer (DoN). SEI is similar to CNA, but a bit larger, and also with a narrow customer focus. Aerospace FFRDC is mid-sized, but also very focused on DoAF and closely related organizations. MITRE tries to be everything to everyone, civilian agencies and the military and the IC. It has lacked focus in recent years. Customers have been unhappy at being charged high rates for inexperienced people or for pseudo-experts. MITRE needs to focus and needs to return to its roots of providing specialized genuine scientific/technical expertise (and move away from general IT support). I doubt this will happen. [/quote] This! From CNA's perspective, its IPR division took a hit with DOGE and the revamping or halting of some FEMA/DHS/FAA and other contracts. They lost staff through firings or voluntary departures. The IPR division is even smaller, but has a higher overhead rate to compete in the government contract world vs true government contractors and/or other FFRDCs who may have multiple cost centers to bring down rates.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics