Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "Big GDS news"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There have been other PUDs, and each is project and site specific. Suggesting that because the other guy got it so I should too is simplistic. I also bet you wrote that letter. [/quote] This is EXACTLY the argument that Cathedral Commons used to get more height and density. They cited a taller building at Vaughan Place that had been constructed as a compromise element of a PUD, in exchange for keeping McLean Gardens from being leveled for redevelopment 30 years ago. They successfully argued that this was precedent for their proposal and the zoning board bought it. It happens a lot. GDS has not explained why they can't build buildings within the plan's provisions and the zoning code. The only reason that they want an exception is greedy $$.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
