Reply to Roy Moore the Pedophile

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Roy Moore the Pedophile"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]"Only two accusers."

How many in your opinion would be enough? 
[/quote]

The WAPO article counts four accusers--but, only one was assaulted according to the story.  The others were over the age of consent (legally).  The accuser today has also accused him of assault.

What PP meant was that it was not the number of accusers that people are talking about.

And, FWIW, the accusers should be believed--until proven otherwise.  Right now, these are brand new accusations.  If true, Moore IS a pedophile.

I just find it hard to believe that this was kept secret for so long.  These women were not looking to get a job like those with Harvey Weinstein.  Moore was not in a position of power over them for the last forty years.  (He definitely was in a position of power when they were teens.)  In small town Alabama, I just find it hard to believe that it did not go out the boundaries of Gadsden.

The other three women in the WAPO article are much more credible.  But, they are not accusing him of assault.

[/quote]

Why do you assert that it did not?  How do you suppose the reporter got wind of the story in the first place?  Because people were talking about Moore's taste for young girls.[/quote]

I believe that he liked younger legal girls, like a lot of men. But the Post could not convict him on that, so made one of them two years younger. And then when the people of Alabama questioned her story, they trotted out some has-been lawyer who Wikileaks has already exposed with another underage 'victim'. Forgive me for my cynicism.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics