Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Indictment Monday?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]Rut Ruh [twitter]https://twitter.com/DailyMail/status/1787544546961695086?t=3gJ_dEaJ5_b_DFZdnbctCQ&s=19[/twitter][/quote] In January 2018. [/quote] Ever notice that Trump is making absolutely no effort to deny the evidence being presented by the prosecution? His only play - ever - is to discredit the prosecution by whatever means necessary, up to and including lying.[/quote] The prosecution is presenting evidence of legal activity and arguing it is illegal. None of this 'conspiracy' is in the grand jury indictment- just falsification of business records a misdemeanor. This case should have been thrown out, and any conviction will be overturned on appeal faster than Harvey Weinstein's.[/quote] So? Then they retry Trump just like Weinstein is being retried.[/quote] The prosecution knows that any possible conviction will be overturned on appeal. The judge knows that any possible conviction will be overturned on appeal. They don't care. They just want to get a conviction - it doesn't matter if it is overturned because any appeal will happen AFTER the election. [b]Their goal is to get a conviction BEFORE the election so Biden can run on that. [/b] Hopefully, the jury is paying attention - especially the two attorneys who presumably know the law. It should be obvious to them that there was no law broken. [/quote] 1) You understand that trump has delayed all of his cases. they could have all been heard before the election season started. The timing his on him and his attorneys. 2) There were obviously laws broken if you are actually looking at the evidence - the paper trail. You don't even need to rely on the testimony. 3) the reason they broke the law to cover this up is obvious in Daniel's testimony today. Had this all come out before people started voting, Hillary would have won.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics