Reply to Roe v Wade struck down

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Roe v Wade struck down"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]All is well for those hate women and want them punished.

[twitter]https://mobile.twitter.com/RobinFulfordTX/status/1562832088243441666?cxt=HHwWhMCo9aDgpbArAAAA[/twitter][/quote]

The OB/Gyns need to leave Texas.  There’s demand for them everywhere.  Let Greg Abbott deliver babies. [/quote]

They are. Unfortunately I live in Southern Texas and three ob/gyns that I know of have moved to New Mexico. It's scary.[/quote]

Of course they have.  Who does not know a women who had struggled with a difficult pregnancy it miscarriage or any number of other reproductive issues that are impacted by this new legal environment?

Instead of working with your doctor,  you now have the state of Texas way overly involved in your reproductive life.   I really would not want my DDs to carry a pregnancy in texas at this point. [/quote]
So many forced birthers are going to reap the whirlwind, as they should. Unfortunately, so too will many normal people who think women should have rights.  [/quote]
Perhaps there is some misinformation going around 
Even if a hospital’s legal team was to say that risking a patient’s life is preferable to the risk of being legally accountable for an abortion, the doctors have taken the Hippocratic oath to do no harm [/quote]

I wasn’t aware the Hippocratic oath keeps doctors out of prison.[/quote]

Apparently it does when it involves terminating the life of a baby -- no harm at all!![/quote]
It’s not a baby. Do you seriously not know the difference between a fetus and a baby? [/quote]
They do not. Unless it’s their own pregnancy they don’t want, then the only moral abortion is their abortion. It’s different rules for them, you see.

Meanwhile talking with someone who likens a 12 week fetus to a baby is like talking to a seventh grader. Lots of opinions, lots of conviction, not a lot of thought and light on the life experience, too. [/quote]
So it is not about the right to life of every conception, but punishing women for their sexuality 
[/quote]
It never was about life, it was always about control and cruelty. Internalized misogyny is real. Forced birthers are, I would guess, even more likely to have internalized our culture’s misogyny and are less likely to have examined it in any way. Look at all the conservative women who are happy to spout off about how women shouldn’t have rights, it’s not biblical (like that means anything), it’s “against nature.” That’s internalized misogyny. [/quote]

+1. It’s also low intelligence. Conservative women generally aren’t the sharpest tools in the shed. There’s a few exceptions, the Serena Joys. But the most part, conservative, misogynistic, and deeply religious = dumb as rocks. Maybe their uteruses are all they are good for?[/quote]
I suspect that the powerful adoption lobby is behind this 
I do not see anyone talking about how to ease the burden of health care and day care costs for low income or young mothers
Day care costs more than in state university and many families spend more on day care than rent

Despite this women are not relinquishing their babies, I have heard that crisis pregnancy centers are expecting an upsurge in adoption
As if women will happily breed for their cause, and therefore their revenue will go up[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics