Reply to Indictment Monday?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Indictment Monday?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]Rut Ruh

[twitter]https://twitter.com/DailyMail/status/1787544546961695086?t=3gJ_dEaJ5_b_DFZdnbctCQ&s=19[/twitter][/quote]

In January 2018. [/quote]

Ever notice that Trump is making absolutely no effort to deny the evidence being presented by the prosecution? His only play - ever - is to discredit the prosecution by whatever means necessary, up to and including lying.[/quote]

The prosecution is presenting evidence of legal activity and arguing it is illegal.  None of this 'conspiracy' is in the grand jury indictment- just falsification of business records a misdemeanor.  This case should have been thrown out, and any conviction will be overturned on appeal faster than Harvey Weinstein's.[/quote]

So?  Then they retry Trump just like Weinstein is being retried.[/quote]

The prosecution knows that any possible conviction will be overturned on appeal. 
The judge knows that any possible conviction will be overturned on appeal.  
They don't care.  They just want to get a conviction - it doesn't matter if it is overturned because any appeal will happen AFTER the election. 
Their goal is to get a conviction BEFORE the election so Biden can run on that.

Hopefully, the jury is paying attention - especially the two attorneys who presumably know the law.  It should be obvious to them that there was no law broken.  [/quote]

It's still not clear what law was actually broken.  How can a state election law misdemeanor regulate a Federal election?[/quote]

Your ignorance is not a defense. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics