Reply to VYS Soccer - better or worse?

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "VYS Soccer - better or worse?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Agree Arlington > McLean. I have 4 kids playing travel soccer and have 1 at Arlington, 2 at McLean. The feedback from coaches and interest in players as individuals is unmatched. I don't feel afraid to talk to any of the Arlington coaches whereas McLean has a system in place where you never approach a coach. Also Arlington older teams practice 4 times a week, McLean only 3. Arlington games are videotaped and coaches go over game film with the kids. At McLean you have to video your own kid. Theres no way the coaches are going to be able to talk to the kids on the team because there are 24 kids on my daughters team and my son has 33 on his. The roster issues are not just a girls side issue.[/quote]

You are in the right demographic for both clubs. I am pretty certain you don’t have a clue about what good coaching or development actually is, but you have explained very well the differences between two clubs with bloated reputations who cannot develop anybody well at younger ages. My kid could make top team at each of these clubs, and both would be closer, but there is no way my kid would ever want to play for either based on what we have seen from these clubs and top teams over the past five years. [/quote]

If your kid could make the top team at Arlington and you are denying him that opportunity, you are doing your son a disservice.
[/quote]

...but then, I'm pretty sure your son wouldn't make the cut
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics