Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]And no one, particularly the city, is suggesting the removal or alteration of the mature oaks. They are heritage trees and are not going anywhere, so please stop misusing the cannard.[/quote] DGS tells everyone that everything will be wonderful. Eat cake and lose weight at the same time. The reality is that even if you confined a rather small pool to the footprint of a tennis court, the pool would require excavation and construction under the drip line of a number of large trees -- which would then be compromised and need to come down. Of course, this ignores the reality that the pool installation of a pool house, surrounding pool deck, support infrastructure, etc. will extend well beyond the pool's footprint, thereby impacting more trees. And that's before anyone talks about altering the topography, including the slopes. You can call it a canard all you want, but it's hard to ignore a quacking duck.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
