Reply to Epstein Files

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Epstein Files"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]THIS IS NOT PARTISAN, If Biden or Clinton or anyone else that is a D is on the list send them to the gulag.

What is becoming VERY clear is that Donnie is DEEPLY involved in all of this. He facilitated thru the pageants he owned the "modeling" agencies and his connections w John Casablancas and Mossad.

It makes all of his failed business make sense because they were shell companies to launder money for "The Circuit".

it ALSO explains why he has been so untouchable. He most likely has dirt on EVERYONE. It's the only thing that makes sense of the last decade of insanity. [/quote]

Then why didn't Joe Biden's Justice Department release them?[/quote]

Who knows? All I do know is that he didn't run a campaign promising to release them. Let's get back to the present day. Donnie is in hot water. period.[/quote]

They will never be released because so many powerful people on both sides of the aisle are compromised.  Tons of business leaders are compromised.  Other world leaders were caught up in this mess.  Frankly, the pedo part is exaggerated (a lot of them were 17), but the bigger issues these girls were basically sex slaves.  Even if they were 18, the entire island was grotesque.  [/quote]

You are disgusting! 17 yr old is no big deal to you? 17 yr old is still a child, a minor, a non adult in case you need a reminder. [/quote]

You think there is a material difference between someone who is 17 years and 11 months and 18 years and 1 month?

You're using the law as if that arbitrary difference matters biologically.  The legal implications and practical implications are different.  Also, it's not clear who was exactly how old at what point. [/quote]

We are strictly talking about legal implications and legal crimes for that matter. There is a rule. Anyone under 18 years is a child and you can twist yourself into a pretzel trying to argue semantics and how you were very mature as a 17 yr old, but if these men were engaging in these acts with a 17 yr, 11 month and 29 days old child, they were committing a crime. Stop being a rape apologist.

You would think as a society we should always protect our children since they don’t have a fully developed prefrontal cortex and are prone to emotional and impulsive decisions but people like you are vile and think there is no big deal if a 16 yr old is assaulted by a 50 yr old as long as we have ‘manufactured consent’. [/quote]
THE GIRLS LIED AND SAID THEY WERE 18. It’s like using a fake ID and being served alcohol and then blaming the bar that you got a DUI. What happened to a little personal accountability?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics