Reply to Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]It might be taken up by the entire DC Circuit Court. If not, it'll likely be treated as a one-off, similar to Bush v. Gore. Political rather than precedential. Which doesn't make the courts look good.[/quote]

Actually, it is precedential.  That was the basis of the appeal.  DOJ asked it to be dropped.

As for the Defense, there was plenty of exculpatory information to show that the prosecution should never have happened.  Misbehavior on the part of FBI and exculpatory information was withheld from defense.  Apparently, more exculpatory information about Strozk was released yesterday.[/quote]

If any of what you wrote were true, this ruling wouldn't be so awful.[/quote]

Oh, don't worry.  What PP wrote is true.  Newly released Strzok notes show that Comey said in the WH meeting that the Flynn calls "appear legit"....that Obama wanted the "right people" on the case...and Biden advocating for the Logan Act.

https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1275803339738021890[/quote]

Do y'all have any idea what "exculpatory" means? Do you have a dictionary?[/quote]

Comey saying that the calls "appear legit" is exculpatory, in that it shows that the Crossfire Razor case should not have been continued.[/quote]

"Appear legit."But were the phone calls actually legit? Flynn never explained. Neither did McFarland or Trump or anyone. No one knows.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics