Reply to Sidwell Sex Scandal

Forum Index » Private & Independent Schools

Reply to "Sidwell Sex Scandal"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You sound hot headed. What if he wasn't treating the daughter? [/quote] the moment that the psychologist met with the child to test if she was gifted, she was treated and from thereafter, considered his client and the relationship subject to the ethics code[/quote]
Newmyer filed complaints against Huntington with the DC and MD State Boards of Psychology (page 5 - http://dcslapplaw.com/files/2013/01/Huntington_counterclaim.pdf ), but apparently Huntington prevailed, because both states list him as a psychologist in good standing with no record of any disciplinary actions against him.  Indeed, the DC Board of Psychology seems to have issued a very favorable ruling for Huntington (page 7 - http://dcslapplaw.com/files/2013/01/Huntington_surreply_opp_slapp_mol.pdf ):

[quote]An independent regulatory body of the District of Columbia, after reviewing all of the documentation submitted by Mr. Newmyer, including Mr. Newmyer's Complaint that Dr. Huntington violated professional ethics, has [u]determined that Dr. Huntington committed no wrong, and that there was "no evidence to indicate that Dr. Huntington provided psychological services[/u]...."  Mr. Newmyer has sued Dr. Huntington for [various claims] deriving from the existence of a therapeutic relationship. As [u]a regulatory body has determined that no therapeutic relationship existed[/u] ..., there can be no professional malpractice, there is no duty upon which is based a breach of fiduciary duty, and there can be no emotional distress caused by any alleged wrongs of Dr. Huntington.[/quote][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics